Nor is it the same as the surgical or medical interventions necessary to save the life of a woman experiencing a spontaneous miscarriage, such as Dilation and Curettage (D&C). Why? Because the elective ending of a normal pregnancy is not the same as the ending of an ectopic pregnancy by the fallopian tube's surgical removal (salpingectomy). The colloquial use of the term abortion-as in "abortions in Florida will be restricted after 15 weeks of pregnancy"-refers to elective abortions, which are those abortions chosen for reasons such as the timing of the pregnancy or the baby's "wrong sex." When a doctor tells her patient that she needs emergency treatment for her ectopic pregnancy, for instance, the doctor never calls it an abortion. Sometimes the misinformation comes through the fudging of language. This dangerous misinformation is a complete fallacy. Against all evidence to the contrary, they're out insisting that the lives of pregnant women with ectopic pregnancies and other potentially fatal conditions will be endangered in states that limit elective abortion. You would hardly know all this-all this medical and moral nuance-if all you hear is the drumbeat of pro-choice activists since the Dobbs v. Wade ruling that recognized women's constitutional right to abortion, sparking protest nationwide. The US Supreme Court overturned the landmark 1973 Roe v. ![]() The embryo is, in fact, already doomed by his or her location, and the mother will almost surely die if the pregnancy is not ended as quickly as possible.Ībortion rights activists demonstrate in front of the White House in Washington, DC on July 09, 2022. Its object is not the death of the embryo but the saving of the mother. Surgery or medical treatment for an ectopic pregnancy is not "elective." It's absolutely necessary. An elective abortion has, as its central purpose, the ending of the life of the embryo or fetus and is performed electively (that is, for social or personal reasons). Why? Because the medical treatment for ectopic pregnancy is not an elective abortion. And yet, she received the same treatment that any woman would have received: the surgical termination of her pregnancy. In short, she, her husband, and her doctors proceeded through the crisis from a purely pro-life moral position. My sister-in-law wanted a doctor who would honor and respect the nascent life inside of her as much as she and that little one's father did. For OB-GYN care, she specifically chose a provider who also believes that every human life is to be treasured and that elective abortion is a grave evil. ![]() For them, their tiny embryo was a son or daughter whose life was precious. You see, my brother and sister-in-law strive to live their lives according to the teachings of the Catholic Church, including its teaching on the moral significance of human life from conception to natural death. ![]() It refutes the disingenuous pro-choice talking point that women suffering miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies will be put at risk in a post- Roe v. Her story is a snapshot of what ectopic pregnancy treatment looks like in a perfectly pro-life setting. There, doctors removed the embryo and the ruptured tube-and saved her life, though it took many months before she fully recovered. A distinguished lawyer in Washington, D.C., a loving wife and devoted mother of three daughters, she was rushed to the hospital. Blood spilled into her abdominal cavity, causing excruciating pain and bringing her to the brink of death. Her little embryo lodged in her fallopian tube instead of her uterus and, at only the seventh week of pregnancy, her tube ruptured. Two years ago, my very-pro-life sister-in-law nearly lost her life due to an ectopic pregnancy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |